I can’t avoid it.

All talk in UK this week is concerned with a forthcoming referendum vote – a choice to ‘remain’ with the European Union, or ‘leave’.   Still, at this very late stage, there is a thirst for information from those who want the element of chance eliminated entirely from their decision, which suggests there are large numbers who want to vote to leave, bbanker 2ut daren’t.

This nervous indecisiveness is, of course, prime meat for the ‘remain’ campaigners, who wade in with dire warnings of financial Armageddon, forfeit of international influence and a variety of other terrors lurking in the black chasm that awaits a friendless UK, condemned to wandering in outer lands.

Why, they reasonably plead, take that chance?  Why leave the safe harbour of your European friends and brothers for the sake of an experiment;  why follow where the inexperienced shepherd leads?   Is it not safer, more prudent, to remain obediently within the fold, where nations may work together for a brighter future?  The EU will progress, will improve and prosper, with you or without you:  why sacrifice your part in that process?

It’s a challenge I can’t resist.

Let’s question the position if the ‘remain’ argument prevails in the vote.  If UK stays Brussels sees all 28 member nations coming under the umbrella of a federalist alliance which must, eventually, mean one government for all (presumably in Brussels, BTW) and one currency for all.  Otherwise any major step forward will be lost in a quagmire of conflicting interests.  28 separate governments, all with their own electorates to appease, already provide plenty of ready examples of this.

The UK is a major culprit.  The Westminster government has exemptions essential to its national interest in many matters, including that vital component, free movement.   The UK will not surrender the pound sterling, nor will it agree (it says) to the admission of further member nations.  Thus it is, in a sense, already halfway out.   It occupies precisely the ‘offshore island’ position Brussels has threatened it will have if the ‘leave’ vote holds sway.   And that is a position that would be untenable anyway, if the federalist plan comes to fruition.

But there is another pivotal question:  just how stable and secure is the EU?   Terrorist activity is on the rise, government response sluggish.  Growth within the EU is negative, decision-making is ponderous, its government unrepresentative of its people.  Greece, Italy and Portugal are treading close to the edge of liquidity, and the cost of living, especially in Greece and Italy, is prohibitive.  Unemployment, especially amongst the young, is outrageously high.  The immigration issue is seriously destabilising, with no prospect of diminishing in numbers in the immediate future.  To grasp the immigration issue the EU has to renege upon Schengen, to resolve its financial imbalances the Franco-German Alliance has to consent to a very much smaller slice of the cake.  Neither of these are feasible without the collapse of the EU.  So, how ‘safe’ is an offshore island tethered to this leaking hulk?  How long, indeed, will it stay afloat?

By contrast the UK scores highly in its ability to trade.  Unemployment is low, growth is positive, and where diplomacy and guile will secure a new market, or negotiate a lucrative deal, the British will succeed:  this is their history as one of the world’s great maritime trading nations.  Although the playing field may have changed, those innate abilities are never lost.  The UK also harbours one of the world’s great financial centres – liberated from EU constraints, its banking sector faces a profitable future.   So, fiscal chasm there is not: a process of levelling, maybe, a lot of sound and fury, maybe, but ultimately signifying nothing.

In making this case I have not emphasised the UK’s status as the EU’s largest trading partner, a market they will be unwilling to forgo.  Nor am I, despite your thoughts, a ‘Little Englander’.  I don’t harbour dreams of national glory, or seek to relive the days of Empire.  I do remember times before the EU, though, and I have some perspective upon all the UK has lost.   With others of my age (I, too, was young and optimistic once) I enthusiastically declared myself a ‘European’ when the clarion call came, and even absorbed gladly the sudden rise in the cost of living that came with it.   But now?  No.  For too many years I have watched various European interests – mainly French, German and Spanish, and more recently Eastern European – rape UK’s assets for their own advantage; and I have watched as the UK gave way, too many times.

The nation has a chance to begin to reclaim some of its own resources.  Maybe it can regain some of its plundered fishing industry by reasserting its territorial waters:  maybe it can subsidise and remodel its agricultural policy, begin to police its borders properly, deport the foreign criminals it is forced to detain here by EU law.

I am all for breaking down the insularity of nation states, all for the ideal of a united world.  I also see these are ambitions that can only succeed when component nation states refrain from using them as a tool for conquest, and show respect for the needs and views of people, rather than their own financial gain.

With regret I have to say of the European Union;  this has not happened – it will not happen – here.

11 responses to “Referendum”

  1. From my side of the Atlantic pond, I knew this vote was coming, but didn’t really know the nuances of joining or not joining. From my perspective, I thought it was weird to have England in the EU. England is like the teenage sister (or brother) of lots of little kids. She looks on them with eye-rolling affection but doesn’t want to play in their sandbox. She wants to go to the movies.


    1. What a perfect analogy! I can’t Trump that! (sorry).

      Liked by 1 person

  2. 😁 Hopefully, we won’t “Trump” it, either.


  3. An informative post, Frederick that throws a bit of light on the issue.
    It’s a long time since I left England – 62 years now – and it was a different country then.
    We are much more isolated from the UK now than we used to be, and although we hear of the fight that’s going on, the pros and cons of the UK belonging to the EU are never put forward with any clarity – we just hear the bickering.
    Re the previous comment from Sahara and your reply – I hope nobody gets Trumped!!


    1. Hi Linda, it’s always good to hear from you. I think it’s too strong a statement to say the country is going down the tubes, but it sometimes feels like that. One should never over-estimate the intelligence of the British voter, and at the moment the remain campaign is seen as being on a rise because an MP was recently murdered. The guy who did it was plainly bananas, but there’s nothing like a bit of sentimentality to sway public opinion…

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yes, we heard about the young MP and were quite shocked as that sort of thing doesn’t usually happen in the UK. I also thought that would cause a backlash and therefore a rise in the remain campaign. It will be interesting to see how it pans out.
        The general Australian voter would probably be the same as yours, but we have compulsory voting here. Good in some ways; scary in others!


  4. Have you changed your position? I think I remember an earlier post where you took the opposite position. Or am I dreaming?

    I think you’ve made some excellent points. I don’t know what to think of this mess. We have a big enough mess ourselves.


    1. Hi Amy: no, I was just practising my cynicism in the earlier post, and my predictions, by and large, are proving correct, unfortunately. The best analogy I can offer is the proposition that the US should unite with Central America and Canada to form one federalist super state, with the seat of government in Tijuana. Can you imagine the furore that would cause?

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I do understand. I am not sure what I would do. I think whatever happens, there will be consequences no one anticipates now.


  5. Thank you for giving this informative break-down, Your argument is most logical – I hope that it gets a lot of attention. I had begun to harbor the awful thought that Germany, after losing two world wars in a quest for dominance was gradually wining the peace by becoming the richest member of the EU able to thrust their opinions down the throats of the other member nations including the insular UK. Or, am I so far removed as to be totally irrelevant in my thoughts?


    1. Irrelevant? Of course not! What takes place here today will have resonances right across the world, eventually, because if UK does vote to leave she will not be the last. I agree with you entirely where Germany is concerned – behind the civilised Merkel smile there beats the heart of a true Hun. Anyone who has experienced a holiday in a predominantly German resort will perfectly understand what you say.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.